Graphology Vs Forensic Document Examination Assignment

Graphology Vs Forensic Document Examination - Assignment Example It does analytical unveiling photocopies, check writers as well as typewriters of certain texts under scrutiny (Headrick & Huber, 2010). It can examine to note any similarity amid inks and uncover exact writing too used. FDE also observes any alterations, hence acting as a legal basis for forensic identification of a trailed culprit (Headrick & Huber, 2010). In the U.S, for one to be recognized as a forensic document examiner he or she needs certification by The American Board of Forensic Document Examiners (ABFDE), unlike for graphologists (Lewis, 2014). In addition, recognized firms normally before considering one eligible for this profession emphasizes on an individual who has a baccalaureate degree, which is a basis for membership. Therefore,  for one to be an FDE candidate he or she ought to have an undergraduate or master’s degree (Lewis, 2014). Conversely, most graphologists gain their respective know-how by themselves. Graphology endeavors to prognosticate character traits or behavior through a close scrutiny of one’s handwriting. FDE entails scrutinizing as well as ascertaining any comparisons amid documents with known material to ascertain who could be the author and exact source of the text. Graphology is entirely diverse from FDE (Headrick & Huber, 2010). These organizations have been there for quite a long time, with the former instituted in 1977 and the recent one 1913. This is unlike graphology, which has no well-instituted organization but an analysts group which is dated back only 18 years (Lewis, 2014). The objectives of the forensic document boards embrace devising, maintaining as well as and enhancing qualification standards for its experts. The graphology web page links young graphologists to experts in graphology to help them improve on their skill (Handwritingpro, 1998).

Hyundai Motor Company Business Challenges and Relationships Case Study

Hyundai Motor Company Business Challenges and Relationships - Case Study Example In a bid to penetrate the markets of the developed countries, the company’s packaging strategy faced great challenges. First, the company’s most expensive car model such as the Santa Fe and Sonata were undervalued when compared against their competitors in those markets. A research in these markets reviled that despite the cars from Hyundai ranking high in terms of quality scores when compared to their competitors, they still had lower resale values. A good example is the Hyundai’s Elantra which had higher quality rankings than the Dodge Neon, Nissan Sentra, and Chrysler but when it came to the resale values all these car models ranked well than it. Similarly, this was phenomena was also exhibited in the Hyundai Santa Fe. Its quality rankings ranked higher than that of competing models such as the Toyota RAV 4, Toyota Highlander, the Jeep Liberty, the Ford Escape and the Mazda Tribute. After one-year of sale, the retail value of the Hyundai Santa Fe was much lowe r than all these car models from competitors. To make matters worse the resale value gap between the Hyundai Santa Fe car and its competitors such as the car models from Toyota was larger than the quality gap between the car models. The resale value of a car is usually considered as the market’s perception of the quality, worth and value of that specific model. These low ranking of the models from Hyundai models in the markets of developed nations pose a great challenge to the survival of the company in those markets.